Comparison of queues with different discrete-time arrival processes (Q2712999)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Comparison of queues with different discrete-time arrival processes |
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Comparison of queues with different discrete-time arrival processes |
scientific article |
Statements
17 January 2002
0 references
convex ordering
0 references
fluid scaling
0 references
increasing convex ordering
0 references
Markovian arrival process
0 references
\((\max,+)\) algebra
0 references
Ross conjecture
0 references
stochastic network
0 references
tandem queue
0 references
uniformization
0 references
0.8985202
0 references
0 references
0.8878107
0 references
0.8848508
0 references
Comparison of queues with different discrete-time arrival processes (English)
0 references
Consider two stochastic event graphs with the same potential arrival epochs \(\{T_n\}\) (coupled say by a uniformization procedure), but where the actual numbers of arrivals at time \(T_n\) differ, say \(A^1_n\), \(A^2_n\) are admitted where the sequences \(\{A^1_n\}\), \(\{A^2_n\}\) have the same average behaviour. Let \({_aW^i_k}\) be the traveling time of the \(k\)th arrival in the \(i\)th graph to some fixed transition \(q\) (for example, the total sojourn time of the \(k\)th customer in a tandem queue with \(q\) stations) and \({_bW^i_k}\) the traveling time of the \(k\)th potential arrival at \(T_k\). It is shown that if \((A^1_1,\dots, A^1_n)\) is smaller than \((A^2_1,\dots, A^2_n)\) in the convex ordering, then \(({_aW^1_1},\dots, {_aW^1_n})\) is smaller than \(({_aW^2_1},\dots, {_aW^2_n})\) in the increasing convex ordering, and similar results are given for the \({_bW^i_k}\). This relates to and generalizes a set of questions going back to Ross. As applications, it is shown that the system with two identical independent sources performs better that the one with identical arrival epochs, that fixed batch sizes are better than random batch sizes, and that fluid scaling improves the performance. The analysis is carried out in the dense class of Markovian arrival processes.
0 references