On piecewise confluent mappings (Q2714186)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: On piecewise confluent mappings |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1603991
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | On piecewise confluent mappings |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1603991 |
Statements
12 June 2001
0 references
confluent mapping
0 references
end continuum
0 references
On piecewise confluent mappings (English)
0 references
The authors consider the following problem of W. T. Ingram, which is problem 35 from the Houston Problem Book, and some variations of the problem [\textit{H. Cook, W. T. Ingram} and \textit{A. Lelek}, Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math. 170, 365-398 (1995; Zbl 0828.54001)]. ``Suppose \(f\) is a continuous mapping of a continuum \(X\) onto a continuum \(Y\), \(Y=H\cup K\) is a decomposition of \(Y\) into subcontinua \(H\) and \(K\), \(f\mid f^{-1}(H)\) and \(f\mid f^{-1}(K)\) are confluent, and \(H\cap K\) is a continuum which does not cut \(Y\) and is an end continuum of both \(H\) and \(K\). Is \(f\) confluent?''NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThe authors show if one uses one definition of end continuum the conditions in the problem cannot be satisfied. However, if one uses the following definition of end continuum, then the answer to the problem is ``yes''. A subcontinuum \(P\) of a continuum \(X\) is said to be an end continuum in \(X\) provided that for every two subcontinua \(K\) and \(L\) of \(X\) the condition \(P\subset K\cap L\) implies that either \(K\subset L\) or \(L\subset K\).
0 references