Martingales versus PDEs in finance: an equivalence result with examples (Q2725292)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Martingales versus PDEs in finance: an equivalence result with examples |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1619094
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Martingales versus PDEs in finance: an equivalence result with examples |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1619094 |
Statements
Martingales versus PDEs in finance: an equivalence result with examples (English)
0 references
6 November 2002
0 references
option valuation
0 references
martingale approach
0 references
partial differential equations
0 references
finance
0 references
Feynman-Kac formula
0 references
There are two main methods to obtain a valuation formula for a given derivative: The martingale approach and the partial differential equation approach. It turns out that it is surprisingly tricky to show that the two approaches are equivalent. The main contribution of the authors is to specify a mixture of analytic and probabilistic assumptions strong enough to allow to prove the equivalence of the two approaches. These assumptions are weak enough to be satisfied in some typical examples from finance. The latter include Heston's stochastic volatility model, the Black-Karasinski term structure model as well as the constant elasticity of variance model introduced by \textit{J. C. Cox} [J. Portfolio Manage., Special Issue Dec. 1996, 15-17 (1996)].
0 references