Error analysis of digital controller using \(\delta\) operators (Q2726012)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Error analysis of digital controller using \(\delta\) operators |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1619893
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Error analysis of digital controller using \(\delta\) operators |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1619893 |
Statements
9 April 2002
0 references
error analysis
0 references
digital control systems
0 references
delta operator
0 references
second-order system
0 references
floating error
0 references
Z-transformation
0 references
pole-assignment controller
0 references
tracking
0 references
round-off noise
0 references
finite word length
0 references
Error analysis of digital controller using \(\delta\) operators (English)
0 references
The present paper is devoted to the error analysis of digital control systems using the delta operator. The well-known theory on delta operators given by \textit{R. H. Middleton} and \textit{G. C. Goodwin} [IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 31, 1015-1021 (1986; Zbl 0608.93053)] is applied.NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThe authors consider a single-input and single-output second-order system of the form NEWLINE\[NEWLINE\delta x(k)= a_1 x(k-1)+ a_2 x(k-2)+ bu(k),NEWLINE\]NEWLINE with the \(\delta\)-form solution NEWLINE\[NEWLINEx(k)= x(k-1)+ T[a_1 x(k-1)+ a_2x(k- 2)+ bu(k)].NEWLINE\]NEWLINE A comparison of the floating error caused by Z-transformation and that by the corresponding \(\delta\)-operator shows that the \(\delta\)-operator is better. A numerical simulation for a second-order integral system and a pole-assignment controller tracking an ideal output in the discrete field are also discussed in detail.NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThe simulation results show that the \(\delta\)-operator has better performance for round-off noise caused by finite word length, higher accuracy and stability than the z-operator.
0 references
0.7771024107933044
0 references
0.7606403827667236
0 references