Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
Between Galilei and Descartes: the arithmetician and engineer Johannes Faulhaber from Ulm - MaRDI portal

Between Galilei and Descartes: the arithmetician and engineer Johannes Faulhaber from Ulm (Q2735055)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1640071
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Between Galilei and Descartes: the arithmetician and engineer Johannes Faulhaber from Ulm
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1640071

    Statements

    0 references
    6 September 2001
    0 references
    mathematical profession in 17th century Germany
    0 references
    secrecy of methods
    0 references
    Peter Roth's Arithmetica Philosophica
    0 references
    René Descartes
    0 references
    Between Galilei and Descartes: the arithmetician and engineer Johannes Faulhaber from Ulm (English)
    0 references
    Faulhaber (1580--1635) was a German reckon master (Rechenmeister) and engineer who sold his knowledge about cubic algebraic equations to students without revealing general methods. In his book ''Arithmetischer Cubicossischer Lustgarten'' (1604) he even did not publish solutions to the assignments. The author describes Faulhaber's conflicts with another reckon master, Peter Roth, who published ''Arithmetica Philosophica'' (1608) as a competing work. Schneider discusses critically the report given by D. Lipstorp on Descartes' visit to Ulm in 1619/20. The author calls Faulhaber a ''professional mathematician'' of his day while scientific mathematics in the modern sense (including generality of methods and communication habits) was rather represented by ''amateurs'' as Descartes. Schneider comes to the conclusion that Faulhaber's main merit was to have been visited by Descartes. The article does not contain numerical examples. Nor is, somewhat contrary to its title, Galilei discussed.NEWLINENEWLINEFor the entire collection see [Zbl 0964.00032].
    0 references

    Identifiers