A classical result on maximal valuation domains revisited (Q2744629)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: A classical result on maximal valuation domains revisited |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1652720
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | A classical result on maximal valuation domains revisited |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1652720 |
Statements
18 August 2002
0 references
linearly compact valuation domain
0 references
complete rings
0 references
valued fields
0 references
A classical result on maximal valuation domains revisited (English)
0 references
A classical result of Kaplansky states that a valuation domain is linearly compact if and only if it is maximal. The main point of Kaplansky's proof is that a non linearly compact valuation domain \(R\) admits a proper immediate extension \(S.\) NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEIn the paper under review, the author proves a very interesting result that \(R\) and \(S\) have the same residue field. The proof is well written, lucid and self-contained. The author uses the same valuation domain \(S\) as constructed by \textit{I. Kaplansky} [Duke Math. J. 9, 303-321 (1942; Zbl 0063.03135)].
0 references