Examples illustrating some aspects of the weak Deligne-Simpson problem (Q2752989)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Examples illustrating some aspects of the weak Deligne-Simpson problem |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1665998
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Examples illustrating some aspects of the weak Deligne-Simpson problem |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1665998 |
Statements
28 October 2001
0 references
regular linear system
0 references
monodromy group
0 references
Fuchsian system
0 references
matrix equations
0 references
Deligne-Simpson problem
0 references
weak Deligne-Simpson conjecture
0 references
centralizers
0 references
Riemann sphere
0 references
conjugacy classes
0 references
Examples illustrating some aspects of the weak Deligne-Simpson problem (English)
0 references
The weak Deligne-Simpson problem states: Give necessary and sufficient conditions for the conjugacy classes \(C_j\subset GL(n,{\mathbb C})\) such that there exist \((p+1)\)-tuples of matrices \(M_j\in C_j\) with trivial centralizers satisfying the equation \(M_1\ldots M_{p+1}=I\). The additive version of the problem considers the conjugacy classes \(c_j\subset gl(n,{\mathbb C})\) and matrices \(A_j\in c_j\) satisfying the condition \(A_1+\ldots+A_{p+1}=0\). The matrices \(M_j\) and \(A_j\) can be interpreted as monodromy operators and as matrices-residua of Fuchsian systems (i.e. with logarithmic poles) of \(n\) linear differential equations on the Riemann sphere. NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThe author considers the variety of \((p+1)\)-tuples of matrices belonging to fixed conjugacy classes and satisfying the weak Deligne-Simpson condition. He constructs new examples of such varieties and discusses their stratified structure and dimension of the strata. It turns out that the dimension of the varieties is higher than the expected, due to the presence of \((p+1)\)-tuples with non-trivial centralizers. In one of the examples the difference between the two dimensions is \({\mathcal O}(n)\).
0 references