Paradox revisited. II: Sets -- a case of all or none? (Q2754651)
From MaRDI portal
 | This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Paradox revisited. II: Sets -- a case of all or none? |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1671354
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Paradox revisited. II: Sets -- a case of all or none? |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1671354 |
Statements
6 June 2002
0 references
logical paradoxes
0 references
semantical paradoxes
0 references
paradoxes of set theory
0 references
Paradox revisited. II: Sets -- a case of all or none? (English)
0 references
[See also Part I above, ibid. 3-15 (2000; Zbl 0986.03010).]NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEFrom the text: In this essay I consider whether we should really accept a view once expressed by Gödel, the view that the paradoxes of set theory are ones that we can see through, can definitely and satisfactorily resolve, even if (as he conceded) the same cannot be said for the semantical paradoxes.NEWLINENEWLINEFor the entire collection see [Zbl 0961.00010].
0 references
