Forcing many positive polarized partition relations between a cardinal and its powerset (Q2758064)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Forcing many positive polarized partition relations between a cardinal and its powerset |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1679337
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Forcing many positive polarized partition relations between a cardinal and its powerset |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1679337 |
Statements
Forcing many positive polarized partition relations between a cardinal and its powerset (English)
0 references
14 July 2002
0 references
polarized partition relations
0 references
adding Cohen subsets
0 references
mixed support
0 references
pure extension
0 references
apure extension
0 references
0 references
0.70691365
0 references
0.7019801
0 references
0.6999936
0 references
0.6990845
0 references
For an ordinal \(\sigma\) and a cardinal \(\tau\), let \(\text{FP}(\sigma,\tau,n)\) denote the set of finite partial functions from \(\sigma\) to \(\tau\) with domain of size \(n\). For cardinal numbers \(\tau\), \(\kappa\) and \(\chi\), the polarized partition symbol \(((\tau)_\sigma) \rightarrow ((\kappa)_\sigma)_\chi^{((1)_n)}\) means that whenever \(F: \text{FP}(\sigma,\tau,n) \to \chi\), there exist \(Y_i \subseteq \tau\), \(i < \sigma \), of size \(\kappa\) such that for all \(a,b \in \text{FP} (\sigma,\tau,n)\), if \(\text{dom}(a) =\text{dom}(b)\) and \(a(i), b(i)\in Y_i\) for all \(i \in \text{dom}(a)\), then \(F(a) = F(b)\). NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThe authors prove that, assuming GCH, if \(\lambda < \mu\) are regular cardinals, then there is a \(\lambda\)-closed cofinality-preserving poset \(P\) forcing that \(2^\lambda = \mu\) and that for \(\sigma < \lambda \leq \kappa < \chi < \tau \leq \mu\) such that \(\chi\) and \(\tau\) are sufficiently far apart, \(((\tau)_\sigma) \rightarrow ((\kappa)_\sigma)_\chi^{((1)_n)}\) holds, thus generalizing an earlier result of the first author [Isr. J. Math. 62, 355-380 (1988; Zbl 0657.03028)]. NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThe forcing adds \(\mu\) Cohen subsets of \(\lambda\) with a kind of mixed support and thus is an elaboration of the method in the latter work. The main point of the forcing is that \(p<q\) decomposes in a pure extension which has closure properties and an apure extension which has local chain condition properties so that preservation of cofinalities is guaranteed. The proof of the partition relation uses that \(\tau \rightarrow (\kappa)_\chi^{m(n)}\) holds in the ground model for a sufficiently large \(m(n)\), and then appeals to a result of the first author [Set theory and its applications, Lect. Notes Math. 1401, Springer, Berlin, 167-193 (1989; Zbl 0683.04002)].
0 references