Decomposability and the cyclic behavior of parabolic composition operators (Q2760124)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1684128
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Decomposability and the cyclic behavior of parabolic composition operators
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1684128

    Statements

    0 references
    1 April 2003
    0 references
    composition operators
    0 references
    Hardy spaces
    0 references
    cyclicity
    0 references
    decomposability
    0 references
    convolution operator
    0 references
    spectrum
    0 references
    Decomposability and the cyclic behavior of parabolic composition operators (English)
    0 references
    This is an interesting and very well written paper on the structure of composition operators on Hardy spaces. Recall that an operator \(T\) on a Banach space \(X\) is decomposable, if for every open covering \(\{V,W\}\) of the plane \(\mathbb{C}\) there is a pair \(\{Y,Z\}\) of closed \(T\)-invariant subspaces such that \(X=Y+Z\) and the spectrum of \(T|_Y\) lies in \(V\) and that of \(T|_Z\) in \(W\). NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThe author now proves that for \(1\leq p<\infty\), any nonsurjective, parabolic linear fractional mapping \(\varphi\) of the unit disk \(\mathbb{D}\) into itself induces on \(H^p\) a composition operator \(C_\varphi: f\mapsto f\circ \varphi\) which is decomposable. This is done by showing that such an operator has a \(C^2\) functional calculus. Let us mention that in Section 4, we find an elegant and short proof of the known result that decomposability follows from the existence of a \(C^\infty\) calculus. NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINETo achieve his goal, the author transfers his problem to the upper-half plane, where the selfmaps under consideration reduce to translations \(z\mapsto z+a\), \(\text{Im } a>0\). From the representation of the associated composition operators as convolution operators now will arise the functional calculus.NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINENoticing that the spectrum of a composition operator \(C_\phi\) associated to a parabolic linear fractional selfmap of \(\mathbb{D}\), different from an automorphism, is either the closed interval \([0,1]\) or a curve that starts at 1 and converges to \(0\) by spiralling infinitely often around it, the author concludes from a result of \textit{T. L. Miller} and \textit{V. G. Miller} [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 127, No. 4, 1029-1037 (1999; Zbl 0911.47012)] on decomposable operators, that each such \(C_\phi\) is not supercyclic. A second, mostly selfcontained proof of the non-supercyclicity is provided, too.NEWLINENEWLINEFor the entire collection see [Zbl 0971.00063].
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references