On preconditioning of penalized matrices (Q2760344)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1684503
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On preconditioning of penalized matrices
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1684503

    Statements

    0 references
    19 December 2001
    0 references
    penalized matrix
    0 references
    preconditioning
    0 references
    conjugate gradient method
    0 references
    SSOR
    0 references
    augmented Lagrangian
    0 references
    symmetric successive overrelaxation
    0 references
    symmetric positive definite
    0 references
    incomplete factorization
    0 references
    efficiency
    0 references
    algorithm
    0 references
    numerical experiments
    0 references
    On preconditioning of penalized matrices (English)
    0 references
    Given a symmetric positive definite matrix \(A\in \mathbb R^{n\times n}\) and a vector \(b\in \mathbb R^n\), a quadratic functional born by \(A\) and \(b\) is to be minimized on a subspace \(V\) of \(\mathbb R^n\). To get rid of constraints, a system \(Bx=b\), \(B\equiv A+\rho C^TC,\) where \(\rho >0\) and \(C\in \mathbb R^{m\times n}\), is solved on \(\mathbb R^n\). A full matrix \(C\) defines \(V\) through \(V=\operatorname {Ker}(C)\). NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEProving the existence of a gap in the spectrum of \(B\) if \(\rho \) is sufficiently large, the author suggests to use an incomplete factorization of \(A\) as a preconditioner for \(B\), and then to apply the conjugate gradient method. NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEBounds for the convergence rate of the method independent of \(\rho\) and rank \(C\) are derived. The efficiency of the algorithm is illustrated by numerical experiments. NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThe paper is short and refers to other works. The reader keen to know more about the background and more details will probably need to consult some of them as the book of \textit{O.~Axelsson} [Iterative solution methods, Cambridge University Press (1994; Zbl 0795.65014)] for example. NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThe interpretation of equality (3.1) seems to be somewhat inaccurate. The parameter \(\varepsilon \) in (3.1) should be read as the upper bound of the relative error.
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers