The largest prime factor of \(X^3+2\) (Q2766400)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: The largest prime factor of \(X^3+2\) |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1696315
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | The largest prime factor of \(X^3+2\) |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1696315 |
Statements
28 January 2002
0 references
irreducible polynomial with positive leading coefficient
0 references
largest prime divisor
0 references
unconditional estimate
0 references
0.65395755
0 references
0.64589214
0 references
0.6355254
0 references
0.6347611
0 references
0 references
0.6251606
0 references
0 references
0 references
The largest prime factor of \(X^3+2\) (English)
0 references
Let \(f\) be an irreducible polynomial with positive leading coefficient, and define \(P(x;f)\) to be the largest prime divisor of \(\prod_{n\leq x} f(n)\). \textit{C. Hooley} [J. Reine Angew. Math. 303/304, 21--50 (1978; Zbl 0391.10028)] gave a proof that \(P(x,X^3+2) > x^{31/30}\) provided one assumes ``Hypothesis \(R^*\)'', a best possible estimate for short Ramanujan-Kloosterman sums. In this paper, the author proves the unconditional estimate NEWLINE\[NEWLINEP(x,X^3+2) > x^{1+\varpi}\quad\text{with}\quad \varpi=10^{-303}.NEWLINE\]NEWLINE Although the constant \(\varpi\) is very small, this result is significant because it is the first unconditional result of the form \(P(x,f)> x^{1+\delta}\) for a polynomial of \(f\) of degree exceeding \(2\). NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEProblems involving \(P(x,f)\) were first considered by Chebyshev, who sketched a proof that \(P(x,X^2+1)/x\to \infty\). In this paper, the author develops a novel variant of Chebyshev's method; this variant method is quite likely to be useful for other problems of Chebyshev type. The original Chebyshev method requires non-trivial estimates of appropriate error terms summed over prime arguments. In the variant, the error terms are summed over ``smooth'' arguments; i.e., over numbers with no large prime factors, and one has considerable freedom about choosing the arguments. The resulting error terms in this paper are estimated via a \(q\)-analogue of van der Corput's method. The basic principles of this method were first sketched in the author's paper ``Hybrid bounds for \(L\)-functions: a \(q\)-analogue of van der Corput's method and a \(t\)-analogue of Burgess' method'', Recent progress in analytic number theory, (ed. H. Halberstam and C. Hooley, Academic Press, London, Vol. 1 (Durham 1979)), 121--126 (1981; Zbl 0457.10021)].
0 references