On the problem of uniqueness for the maximum Stirling number(s) of the second kind (Q2768455)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: On the problem of uniqueness for the maximum Stirling number(s) of the second kind |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1699535
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | On the problem of uniqueness for the maximum Stirling number(s) of the second kind |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1699535 |
Statements
2 April 2002
0 references
Stirling numbers of the second kind
0 references
unimodality
0 references
On the problem of uniqueness for the maximum Stirling number(s) of the second kind (English)
0 references
It has been known that the Stirling numbers of the second kind, \(S(n,k)\), have an increasing interval and decreasing interval, when \(1 \leq k \leq n\). It follows that a maximum value is taken for one or two values of \(k\). The only known example of two maximum places is \(n=2\), when \(S(2,1)=S(2,2)=1\). H. Wegner conjectured that there are no more examples. Notwithstanding a confusing review in the literature, Wegner's conjecture is still open. Let \(E(x)\) denote the number of integer \(n\)'s (\(2\leq n \leq x \)), for which \(S(n,k)\) takes its maximum value twice. The main result of the paper is the bound \(E(x)=O(x^{3/5+ \varepsilon})\), and a heuristic argument, why \(E(x)\) is expected to be bounded. There is computer-based proof for \(E(10^6)=1\). (Unlike in many other computer-based proofs, sufficient details are given for those who want to repeat the calculations).
0 references