A comparison of two quadratic approaches to hedging in incomplete markets (Q2770981)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: A comparison of two quadratic approaches to hedging in incomplete markets |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1704433
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | A comparison of two quadratic approaches to hedging in incomplete markets |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1704433 |
Statements
16 March 2004
0 references
incomplete financial markets
0 references
stochastic models
0 references
local risk-minimisation
0 references
mean-variance hedging
0 references
partial differential equations
0 references
simulation
0 references
A comparison of two quadratic approaches to hedging in incomplete markets (English)
0 references
The valuation and hedging of derivatives in incomplete financial markets is a frequently studied problem in mathematical finance that still lacks of a commonly agreed uniformly superior method. The authors with their paper try to contribute to the discussion on this issue by comparing both theoretically and numerically the two main competing quadratic hedging approaches, the local risk-minimization and the mean-variance hedging in a class of stochastic volatility models. They explain the theory for both approaches in a general framework, they specialise to a Markovian situation, and then analyse in detail variants of two well-known stochastic volatility models, the Heston and Stein and Stein models. They also provide numerical results obtained mainly through the use of partial differential equations and simulation methods taking special care in order to check that the presented examples satisfy the required by the general related theory conditions.
0 references