A comparison of two quadratic approaches to hedging in incomplete markets (Q2770981)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1704433
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A comparison of two quadratic approaches to hedging in incomplete markets
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1704433

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    16 March 2004
    0 references
    incomplete financial markets
    0 references
    stochastic models
    0 references
    local risk-minimisation
    0 references
    mean-variance hedging
    0 references
    partial differential equations
    0 references
    simulation
    0 references
    A comparison of two quadratic approaches to hedging in incomplete markets (English)
    0 references
    The valuation and hedging of derivatives in incomplete financial markets is a frequently studied problem in mathematical finance that still lacks of a commonly agreed uniformly superior method. The authors with their paper try to contribute to the discussion on this issue by comparing both theoretically and numerically the two main competing quadratic hedging approaches, the local risk-minimization and the mean-variance hedging in a class of stochastic volatility models. They explain the theory for both approaches in a general framework, they specialise to a Markovian situation, and then analyse in detail variants of two well-known stochastic volatility models, the Heston and Stein and Stein models. They also provide numerical results obtained mainly through the use of partial differential equations and simulation methods taking special care in order to check that the presented examples satisfy the required by the general related theory conditions.
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references