Rigidity of generalized Verma modules (Q2773356)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Rigidity of generalized Verma modules |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1709946
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Rigidity of generalized Verma modules |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1709946 |
Statements
Rigidity of generalized Verma modules (English)
0 references
21 February 2002
0 references
generalized Verma module
0 references
rigidity
0 references
parabolic sub-algebra
0 references
This paper continues the study of certain parabolic generalizations, \({\mathcal O}({\mathfrak p}, \Lambda)\), of the category \(\mathcal O\) of semisimple complex finite-dimensional Lie algebras, where \(\mathfrak p\) is a parabolic subalgebra of the Lie algebra with a fixed triangular decomposition and \(\Lambda\) is a certain admissible category of \(\mathfrak a\)-modules. These categories \({\mathcal O}({\mathfrak p}, \Lambda)\) were introduced by V. Futorny, S. König and V. Mazorchuk. It is shown that the blocks of the category \({\mathcal O}({\mathfrak p}, \Lambda)\) contain generalized Verma modules. The main interest in the present paper is the question whether these modules are rigid, that is, whether the socle filtration and the radical filtration of a generalized Verma module coincide with each other. This is an analogous question to that for the Verma modules in the category \(\mathcal O\) introduced by I. N. Bernstein, I. M. Gelfand and S. I. Gelfand. The nice result in the paper under review shows that generalized Verma modules induced from the generic Gelfand-Zetlin modules or associated with the Enright-complete modules are rigid.
0 references