Strong law of large numbers for ``subsequences'' on the plain (Q2777838)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Strong law of large numbers for ``subsequences on the plain |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1718883
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Strong law of large numbers for ``subsequences'' on the plain |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1718883 |
Statements
13 March 2002
0 references
strong law of large numbers
0 references
random fields
0 references
0.9171609
0 references
0.9157425
0 references
0.9111587
0 references
0.9104289
0 references
0.9091385
0 references
0.9046426
0 references
0.90440273
0 references
Strong law of large numbers for ``subsequences'' on the plain (English)
0 references
Let \(\{X(m,n);m\geq 1,n\geq 1\}\) be a family of independent and identically distributed random variables and let \(S(m,n)=\sum_{i=1}^m\sum_{j=1}^n X(i,j)\). The strong law of large numbers for the field \(\{X(m,n)\}\) means that \(\lim_{(m,n)\in A,\max\{m,n\}\to\infty}S(m,n)/mn\) exists a.s. The first result of this type goes back to \textit{N. Wiener} [Duke Math. J. 5, 1-18 (1939; Zbl 0021.23501)] who studied the case of a weakly stationary field in the framework of the ergodic theory. \textit{R. T. Smythe} [Ann. Probab. 1, 164-170 (1973; Zbl 0258.60026)] and \textit{A. Gut} [ibid. 11, 569-577 (1983; Zbl 0515.60028)] proposed necessary and sufficient conditions for the strong law of large numbers for the special sets \(A={\mathbb N}^2\) and \(A=\{(m,n)\in{\mathbb N}^2\colon\theta m\leq n\leq\theta^{-1}m,0<\theta<1\}\). NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEIn this article the necessary conditions \(E|X|<\infty,\sum_{(m,n)\in A}P\{|X|\geq mn\}<\infty\) are proved for the strong law of large numbers with the set \(A=\{(m,n)\in{\mathbb N}^2\colon f(m)\leq n\leq g(m)\}\), where \(f(x),g(x)\) are positive nondecreasing functions such that \(f(x)\leq x\leq g(x)\). These conditions were proposed by the author and \textit{Z. Rychlik} [Theory Probab. Math. Stat. 58, 35-41 (1999); translation from Teor. Jmovirn. Mat. Stat. 58, 31-37 (1998; Zbl 0943.60025)]. In this article the author involves more probabilistic arguments and does not use the number theory arguments being the main tool in the previous article. Moreover, the presented method is easy to extend to higher dimensions. Some examples are proposed.
0 references