On the restriction of cuspidal representations to unipotent elements (Q2777973)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: On the restriction of cuspidal representations to unipotent elements |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1719240
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | On the restriction of cuspidal representations to unipotent elements |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1719240 |
Statements
22 September 2002
0 references
connected split classical reductive groups
0 references
character formulae
0 references
maximal split tori
0 references
Borel subgroups
0 references
Weil groups
0 references
irreducible representations
0 references
cuspidal characters
0 references
unipotent elements
0 references
unipotent representations
0 references
0.75453043
0 references
0 references
0 references
0.71079206
0 references
0.70544547
0 references
On the restriction of cuspidal representations to unipotent elements (English)
0 references
The paper examines characters of representations of a connected split classical reductive group \(G\) over a finite field \(\mathbb{F}_q\). The main result is a character formula for classical groups on nilpotent elements. If \(T\) is a maximal split torus and \(B\) a Borel subgroup containing \(T\), then by \textit{R. B. Howlett} and \textit{G. I. Lehrer} [Invent. Math. 58, 37-64 (1980; Zbl 0435.20023)] the algebra \(\text{End}_{G(\mathbb{F}_q)}(\text{Ind}^{G(\mathbb{F}_q)}_{B(\mathbb{F}_q)}(1))\) can be identified with the group algebra \(\mathbb{C}[W]\), where \(W\) is the Weil group of \(G\). The authors use a correspondence of the irreducible components of \(\text{Ind}_{B(\mathbb{F}_q)}^{G(\mathbb{F}_q)}(1)\), and the irreducible representations of \(W\) to express the values of cuspidal characters of split classical groups at unipotent elements as alternating sums of character values of some components corresponding to exterior power representations of the reflection representation of \(W\). Moreover, in the sum contribute certain characters coming from a correspondence of similar type, but depending on the choice of \(G\) in a more sophisticated way.NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEFor the proof of the main theorem the authors determine the characters of \(W\) on the Coxeter conjugacy class, i.e. on an element of maximal length with respect to a Coxeter system, to be \(1\), \(-1\) or \(0\) and parametrize the unipotent representations of \(G\), where the notion of unipotent representation is due to \textit{P. Deligne} and \textit{G. Lusztig} [J. Algebra 81, 540-545 (1983; Zbl 0535.20020)].
0 references