The umbral transfer-matrix method. V: The Goulden-Jackson cluster method for infinitely many mistakes (Q2778469)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: The umbral transfer-matrix method. V: The Goulden-Jackson cluster method for infinitely many mistakes |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1716043
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | The umbral transfer-matrix method. V: The Goulden-Jackson cluster method for infinitely many mistakes |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1716043 |
Statements
2 April 2002
0 references
umbral transfer-matrix method
0 references
Goulden-Jackson cluster method
0 references
generating functions
0 references
generating enumerating words
0 references
mistakes
0 references
self-avoiding walks
0 references
0.80028296
0 references
0.7953363
0 references
0.7759154
0 references
0 references
0.7671348
0 references
0.7668282
0 references
The umbral transfer-matrix method. V: The Goulden-Jackson cluster method for infinitely many mistakes (English)
0 references
This paper is on the umbral transfer-matrix method, based on Gian-Carlo Rota's seminal concept of the umbra. It is one of the series of papers on this topic written by the author. The classical Goulden-Jackson cluster method is available to compute generating functions enumerating words that avoid, as factors, any given finite set of mistakes. Here the powerful Goulden-Jackson cluster method is extended to the situation to compute generating enumerating words avoiding infinitely many mistakes. The goal achieved here is: Given a finite alphabet and a finite set of symbolic words (called mistakes), compute the generating function \(f(t):= \sum_{n=0} b_nt^n\), where \(b_n\) denotes the number of \(n\)-letter words in the alphabet not containing, as factors, any of these symbolic mistakes. A simple illustrative example of computing \(f(t)\) based on the alphabet \(\{1,2,3\}\) and avoiding any factor of the form \(A:= 1\overset{a+1} 2\;\overset{a+1} 3 1\), i.e., avoiding \(1231\), \(122331\), \(12223331,\dots\) as factors, i.e., avoiding infinitely many mistakes. Finally, the method is illustrated by introducing a new `fancy toy model' for self-avoiding walks which is more interesting than finite-memory approximations.
0 references