Twisted \(L\)-functions and monodromy (Q2781439)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Twisted \(L\)-functions and monodromy |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1721444
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Twisted \(L\)-functions and monodromy |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1721444 |
Statements
20 March 2002
0 references
\(\ell\)-adic sheaves
0 references
Kummer sheaves
0 references
monodromy groups
0 references
Twisted \(L\)-functions and monodromy (English)
0 references
The book under review deals with \(L\)-functions of \(\ell\)-adic étale sheaves over finite fields. The ``twisted'' in the title refers to tensoring them with a Kummer-sheaf depending on a parameter which lies in an open subset of the affine space. For a finite field \(k\) one can average over all \(k\)-points of this parameter space and compute asymptotics as the order of \(k\) approaches infinity. By the fundamental result of Deligne these are determiend by the arithmetic and geometric monodromy groups of \(\ell\)-adic sheaves on the parameter space. Thus the bulk of the book computes these monodromies, or better shows that they are big. They lie either between some \(\text{SL}(d)\) and \(\text{GL}(d)\), or are equal (in case the sheaves are self-dual) to either the orthogonal groups \(\text{SO}(d)\) or \(\text{O}(d)\), or to the symplectic group \(\text{SP}(d)\). These results are derived from considerations about the actions of inertia at the boundary. The author computes many examples, the most interesting aspect being the subtle difference between \(\text{SO}(d)\) and \(\text{O}(d)\).
0 references