Reflexive modules are not closed under submodules (Q2782427)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Reflexive modules are not closed under submodules |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1724361
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Reflexive modules are not closed under submodules |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1724361 |
Statements
1 April 2003
0 references
reflexive modules
0 references
cotilting bimodules
0 references
generalized Kronecker algebras
0 references
finitely generated projective modules
0 references
indecomposable cyclic modules
0 references
Reflexive modules are not closed under submodules (English)
0 references
The object of this paper is to prove that the classes of reflexive modules with respect to a cotilting bimodule fail to be closed under submodules. The author considers an infinite-dimensional generalized Kronecker algebra \(A\) over an algebraically closed field \(K\) and shows that \(_AA_A\) is a cotilting bimodule which has very few reflexive modules, as these are just the finitely generated projective modules. As a consequence of this fact, the only reflexive modules with respect to \(_AA_A\) with the property that all the submodules are also reflexive, are those that are finite-dimensional over \(K\). From this it follows that, for such an algebra, both classes of reflexive modules are not closed under submodules. As an application, the author also exhibits some surprising properties of this construction. For example, it is shown that, for any nonzero cardinal \(c\) which is less than or equal to the dimension of \(A\) over \(K\), there exists an indecomposable cyclic \(A\)-module \(M\) of dimension \(c\) over \(K\), such that \(\Hom_A(M,A)=0\), and \(\text{Ext}^1_A(M,A)\) is a free module of uncountable rank.NEWLINENEWLINEFor the entire collection see [Zbl 0974.00038].
0 references