Points of bounded height on smooth hypersurfaces of toric varieties (Q2787075)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6545341
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Points of bounded height on smooth hypersurfaces of toric varieties
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6545341

    Statements

    0 references
    24 February 2016
    0 references
    Manin's conjecture
    0 references
    points of bounded height
    0 references
    rational points
    0 references
    circle method
    0 references
    toric variety
    0 references
    hypersurface
    0 references
    math.NT
    0 references
    Points of bounded height on smooth hypersurfaces of toric varieties (English)
    0 references
    This paper uses the circle method to investigate Manin's conjecture for subvarieties of codimension one within certain toric varieties. It is inspired by the work of \textit{D. Schindler} [J. Reine Angew. Math. 714, 209--250 (2016; Zbl 1343.11061)], who considered hypersurfaces in bi-projective space. Schindler's work itself built on ideas of \textit{B. J. Birch} [Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. A 265, 245--263 (1962; Zbl 0103.03102)], which used the circle method.NEWLINENEWLINEThe toric variety considered here is the quotient of NEWLINE\[NEWLINE(\mathbb{A}^{r+1}\setminus\{0\})\times((\mathbb{A}^{m-r}\times \mathbb{A}^{n-m+1})\setminus\{0\})\subset\mathbb{A}^{n+2}NEWLINE\]NEWLINE by the action of the torus \(\mathbb{C}^*\times \mathbb{C}^*\), given by NEWLINE\[NEWLINE(\lambda,\nu)\cdot(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{y},\mathbf{z})= (\lambda\mathbf{x},\lambda\mu\mathbf{y},\mu\mathbf{z}).NEWLINE\]NEWLINE One then has a hypersurface \(Y\) in this toric variety, given by \(F(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{y},\mathbf{z})=0\), where \(F\) is homogeneous of degree \(d_1\), say in \((\mathbf{x},\mathbf{y})\) and homogeneous of degree \(d_2\) in \((\mathbf{y},\mathbf{z})\).NEWLINENEWLINEFor an appropriate height function on \(Y\) and a suitable open subset \(U\), both specified in the paper, it is then shown that Manin's conjecture holds in the form NEWLINE\[NEWLINEN_{U,H}(B)=C_H(Y)B\log B+O(B)NEWLINE\]NEWLINE for large enough \(n\). Here \(C_H(Y)\) is the constant predicted by \textit{E. Peyre} [Duke Math. J. 79, No. 1, 101--218 (1995; Zbl 0901.14025)]. The condition required for \(n\) is that NEWLINE\[NEWLINEn+2-\max\{\dim V_1^*,\text{dim}\, V_2^*\}>13d_2(d_1+d_2)2^{d_1+d_2},NEWLINE\]NEWLINE provided that \(d_1\geq 2\) and \(d_1\geq 1\). Here \(V_1^*\) and \(V_2^*\) are certain singular loci, in the spirit of Birch's work.NEWLINENEWLINEThe difficulty with the proof is that the condition \(H(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{y},\mathbf{z})\leq B\) does not correspond to a rectangular box in \(\mathbb{R}^{n+2}\). As a result one has to count points in boxes defined by two parameters \(P_1\) and \(P_2\), and combine the various results, using the ideas of \textit{V. Blomer} and \textit{J. BrĂ¼dern} [``Counting in hyperbolic spikes : the diophantine analysis of multihomogeneous diagonal equations'', Preprint, \url{arXiv:1402.1122}]. There are different treatments for the cases in which \(P_1\) and \(P_2\) are ``small'', and that in which they have comparable size. The overall framework follows that of Schindler, but there are many additional technicalities.
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references