Nonemptiness of Brill-Noether loci in \(M(2,L)\) (Q2788776)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6543492
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Nonemptiness of Brill-Noether loci in \(M(2,L)\)
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6543492

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    22 February 2016
    0 references
    smooth projective curve
    0 references
    stable vector bundle
    0 references
    Brill-Noether locus
    0 references
    Porteous formula
    0 references
    Nonemptiness of Brill-Noether loci in \(M(2,L)\) (English)
    0 references
    For a complex, smooth, projective curve \(C\) of genus \(g \geq 2\), let \(M(2,d)\) (respectively \(M(2,L)\)) be the moduli space of rank \(2\) stable vector bundles of degree \(d\) (respectively of determinant \(L\), where \(L\) is a line bundle of degree \(d\)). One denotes by \(B(2,d,k)\) (respectively \(B(2,L,k)\)) the (Brill-Noether) locus of those vector bundles \(E\) in \(M(2,d)\) (respectively in \(M(2,L)\)) with \(h^0(E) \geq k\). In the Introduction, known results (and the methods to prove them) on the nonemptiness of the Brill-Noether locus are discussed. In the paper under review, the case \(d\) odd is studied. One shows that \(B(2,L,k)\) has a virtual fundamental class which is not zero, under certain numerical conditions. Consequently, in those cases, the Brill-Noether locus is not empty. ``For many values of \(d\) and \(k\) the result is best possible.'' The results are improved for \(k \leq 5\). The proof uses Porteous formula and a combinatorial lemma which is proved in the Appendix.
    0 references

    Identifiers