Upper bounds for the number of resonances on geometrically finite hyperbolic manifolds (Q280289)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Upper bounds for the number of resonances on geometrically finite hyperbolic manifolds |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6578172
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Upper bounds for the number of resonances on geometrically finite hyperbolic manifolds |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6578172 |
Statements
Upper bounds for the number of resonances on geometrically finite hyperbolic manifolds (English)
0 references
9 May 2016
0 references
resonances
0 references
geometrically finite hyperbolic manifolds
0 references
spectral geometry
0 references
Let \(X=\Gamma\backslash \mathbb H^{n+1}\) be a geometrically finite hyperbolic manifold with \(n\) cusps. Let \(N_X(R)\) be the number of resonances (poles of the resolvent of the Laplace operator on \(X\)), counted with multiplicities, satisfying \(|s-n/2|\leq R\). The authors prove that there exists \(C>0\) such that NEWLINE\[NEWLINE N_X(R)\leq C\,\frac{(\Lambda_X(2R))^{n+2}}{R} NEWLINE\]NEWLINE for all \(R>1\), where \(\Lambda_X(\cdot)\) is some function depending on the cusps. Moreover, if the cusps all satisfy certain condition (called the Diophantine condition by the authors), then NEWLINE\[NEWLINE N_X(R)\leq C R^{n+1}(\log R)^{n+2} NEWLINE\]NEWLINE for all \(R>1\).NEWLINENEWLINEThe article also includes some consequence of this result, like \(N_X(R)=\mathcal O(R^{n+1})\) already proven, and a bound for the resonance counting function in vertical strips.
0 references