Borsuk-Ulam type spaces (Q2802999)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Borsuk-Ulam type spaces |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6576745
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Borsuk-Ulam type spaces |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6576745 |
Statements
3 May 2016
0 references
Borsuk-Ulam theorem
0 references
Lusternik-Schnirelmann
0 references
Tucker's lemma
0 references
Yang's index
0 references
math.AT
0 references
math.CO
0 references
math.GT
0 references
0.7004868
0 references
0.69757617
0 references
0.68987274
0 references
0.6760871
0 references
0.6521696
0 references
0.63859004
0 references
0.63674986
0 references
Borsuk-Ulam type spaces (English)
0 references
The classical Borsuk-Ulam theorem asserts that for any continuous mapping from the \(n\)-dimensional sphere \(\mathbb{S}^n\) into the \(n\)-dimensional Euclidean space \(\mathbb{R}^n\), \(f: \mathbb{S}^n \to \mathbb{R}^n\), there is a point \(x\in \mathbb{S}^n \) such that \(f(x)=f(-x)\). The Borsuk-Ulam theorem is equivalent to several other geometric results about spheres such as the Lusternik-Schnirelmann-Borsuk theorem, Tucker's lemma, the non-existence of an antipode-preserving-map \(f: \mathbb{S}^n \to \mathbb{S}^{n-1}\), etc. In a more general setting, given a topological space \(X\) with a free involution \(A: X\to X\), the pair \((X,A)\) is called a \(\text{BUT}_n\) (Borsuk-Ulam type space) if for any continuous mapping \(f: X \to \mathbb{\mathbb R}^n\) there is \(x\in X\) such that \(f(A(x))=f(x)\). And \((X,A)\) is said to be a \(\text{BUT}\) space if it is a \(\text{BUT}_n\) for \(n=\text{dim} \, X\). In [\textit{P. Bacon}, Can. J. Math. 18, 492--502 (1966; Zbl 0142.20804)], for \(X\) a normal topological space, the equivalence between \((X,A)\) being a \(\text{BUT}_n\), an \(\text{LS}_n\)(Lusternik-Schnirelmann space), a \(\text{T}_n\)(Tucker space), etc., was shown. In the present paper, the authors give interesting necessary and sufficient conditions for a space to be \(\text{BUT}\), some of them involving the use of Yang's cohomological index.
0 references