A posteriori error estimates for discontinuous Galerkin methods using non-polynomial basis functions. I: Second order linear PDE. (Q2820349)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: A posteriori error estimates for discontinuous Galerkin methods using non-polynomial basis functions. I: Second order linear PDE. |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6627662
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | A posteriori error estimates for discontinuous Galerkin methods using non-polynomial basis functions. I: Second order linear PDE. |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6627662 |
Statements
15 September 2016
0 references
discontinuous Galerkin method
0 references
a posteriori error estimation
0 references
non-polynomial basis functions
0 references
penalty parameter
0 references
numerical result
0 references
0 references
0.9343057
0 references
0.9331747
0 references
0.9261338
0 references
0.9205631
0 references
0.9183432
0 references
0.91417146
0 references
0.91324115
0 references
A posteriori error estimates for discontinuous Galerkin methods using non-polynomial basis functions. I: Second order linear PDE. (English)
0 references
The authors present a systematic work to derive a posteriori error estimates for general non-polynomial basis functions in an interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin (DG) formulation for solving second-order linear partial differential equations. The residual type upper and lower bound error estimates measure the error in the energy norm. The method presented is parameter-free, in the sense that all but one solution-dependent constants appearing in the upper and lower bound estimates are explicitly computable by solving local eigenvalue problems, and the only non-computable constant can be reasonably approximated by a computable one without affecting the overall effectiveness of the estimates in practice. The penalty parameter in the interior penalty formulation can be automatically determined. An efficient numerical procedure to compute the error estimators is developed. Numerical results for several problems in 1D and 2D demonstrate that both the upper bound and lower bound are effective.
0 references