Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
The originality of Peano's 1886 existence theorem on scalar differential equations - MaRDI portal

The originality of Peano's 1886 existence theorem on scalar differential equations (Q2821968)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6629818
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The originality of Peano's 1886 existence theorem on scalar differential equations
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6629818

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    26 September 2016
    0 references
    Peano
    0 references
    ordinary differential equations
    0 references
    Peano's existence theorem
    0 references
    differential inequalities
    0 references
    Grönwall-type inequalities
    0 references
    strict sub-solutions
    0 references
    strict super-solutions
    0 references
    sub-solution method
    0 references
    super-solution-method
    0 references
    maximum solution
    0 references
    minimum solution
    0 references
    continuously differentiable function
    0 references
    Weierstrass maximum theorem
    0 references
    The originality of Peano's 1886 existence theorem on scalar differential equations (English)
    0 references
    This paper revisits Giuseppe Peano's 1886 proof of the result that the continuity of a function \(f:[a,b]\times\mathbb R\rightarrow\mathbb R\) is a sufficient condition for an initial value problem \(y'=f(x,y)\), \(y(a)=c\), to have one or more local solutions. The authors provide a proof that is historically sensitive to Peano's work: it uses only those techniques and concepts that were available to Peano himself. The authors' goal is to emphasise the now-largely-forgotten methods employed by Peano, and also to give a proof that is more complete than the original, which has been criticised for lack of rigour. The paper begins with a detailed statement of the theorem in question, together with a brief outline of its historical development. A series of preparatory lemmas is proved, and then the theorem itself.
    0 references

    Identifiers