The \(k\)th border-bishop domination problem (Q2831566)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: The \(k\)th border-bishop domination problem |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6651207
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | The \(k\)th border-bishop domination problem |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6651207 |
Statements
10 November 2016
0 references
domination
0 references
bishop's graph
0 references
The \(k\)th border-bishop domination problem (English)
0 references
Given an \(n \times n\) chessboard, the first border consists of squares along the edge of the board. Recursively, the \(k\)th border consists of squares that border the \((k-1)\)th border squares. The \(k\)th border bishop problem asks for the minimum number \(\mathrm{Bor}(B_{n,k})\) of bishops needed so that every square is attacked or occupied by a bishop when the placement is limited only to the \(k\)th border squares.NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINE The following results are established in this paper. When either \(n \equiv 2, 3 \pmod{4}\) or \(k < \lfloor \frac{n}{4} \rfloor + 1\), \(\mathrm{Bor}(B_{n,k}) = 2n - 4k + 2\). When \(k = \lfloor \frac{n}{4} \rfloor + 1\) and \(n \equiv 0, 1 \pmod{4}\), \(\mathrm{Bor}(B_{n,k}) = 2n - 4k + 4\) and \(2n - 4k + 3\), respectively. A dominating set is impossible to find if \(k > \lfloor \frac{n}{4} \rfloor + 1\). If domination is possible, the ways to place the minimum \(k\)th border dominating sets are given as \((n - 4k + 5)(n - 4k + 7) \times 4^{n-3k}\) for odd \(n\) and \((n - 4k + 6)^2 \times 4^{n-3k}\) for even \(n\), unless \(k = \lfloor \frac{n}{4} \rfloor + 1\) and \(n \equiv 0, 1 \pmod{4}\). In this case the numbers are \(2^{\frac{n}{2}-2}\) and \(2^{\frac{n+1}{2}}\), respectively.
0 references