On the distinction between the classes of Dixmier and Connes-Dixmier traces (Q2838975)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: On the distinction between the classes of Dixmier and Connes-Dixmier traces |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6183797
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | On the distinction between the classes of Dixmier and Connes-Dixmier traces |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6183797 |
Statements
On the distinction between the classes of Dixmier and Connes-Dixmier traces (English)
0 references
4 July 2013
0 references
Dixmier trace
0 references
generalized limits
0 references
Marcinkiewicz space
0 references
0 references
0 references
For a nonnegative self-adjoint operator \(T\) its Dixmier trace can be defined as \(\mathrm{Tr}_{\omega}(T)=\lim_{N\to\infty} {1\over N} \sum_{i=0}^N \mu_i\), where \(\mu_i\) are the eigenvalues of \(T\) and \(\lim\) is a generalized limit depending on a parameter \(\omega\). A Connes-Dixmier trace has been introduced by \textit{S. Lord, A. Sedaev} and \textit{F. Sukochev} in [J. Funct. Anal. 224, No. 1, 72--106 (2005; Zbl 1081.46042)]. The main result of the paper says that in general the Dixmier and the Connes-Dixmier traces do not coincide with each other; concrete examples of this phenomenon are given. A draft of the paper is available at \url{arXiv:1210.3397}.
0 references