Singularities and non-hyperbolic manifolds do not coincide (Q2839491)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6187096
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Singularities and non-hyperbolic manifolds do not coincide
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6187096

    Statements

    Singularities and non-hyperbolic manifolds do not coincide (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    11 July 2013
    0 references
    Boltzmann-Sinai ergodic hypothesis
    0 references
    Chernov-Sinai Ansatz
    0 references
    hard ball systems
    0 references
    ergodicity
    0 references
    This paper completes the proof of the Boltzmann-Sinai ergodic hypothesis for hard ball systems on the \(n\)-torus \(\mathbb{R}^n/\mathbb{Z}^n\), for \(n\geq 2\), without any assumed additional hypotheses or exceptional models.NEWLINENEWLINE The Boltzmann-Sinai hypothesis states that a gas with \(N\geq 2\) hard balls (having not too large a radius) on the \(n\)-torus \((n\geq 2)\) is ergodic, provided that certain necessary reductions have been made. Those reductions are: the total energy is fixed, the total momentum is zero, and the center of mass is restricted to a certain discrete lattice in the torus. The ``not too large a radius'' restriction is needed to make sure that the interior of the configuration space is connected.NEWLINENEWLINE The missing piece that this paper addresses is to prove the Chernov-Sinai Ansatz: No open piece of the singularity manifold can coincide precisely with the codimension-one manifold that describes future non-hyperbolicity of the trajectories. The proof is by contradiction, and is done first for \(n=2\), then \(n\geq 3\).
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references