Semi-Lagrangian schemes for linear and fully non-linear diffusion equations (Q2840616)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Semi-Lagrangian schemes for linear and fully non-linear diffusion equations |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6190119
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Semi-Lagrangian schemes for linear and fully non-linear diffusion equations |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6190119 |
Statements
Semi-Lagrangian schemes for linear and fully non-linear diffusion equations (English)
0 references
23 July 2013
0 references
Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations
0 references
viscosity solution
0 references
stability
0 references
convergence
0 references
error bound
0 references
monotone approximation schemes
0 references
difference-interpolation methods
0 references
degenerate parabolic equations
0 references
numerical examples
0 references
optimal control
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
There is an attempt to analyse a class of approximation schemes for fully nonlinear Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations. The authors introduce two schemes for the solution of the problems: (i) a linear semi Lagrangian (LISL)scheme defined on unstructured grids and (ii) a cubic interpolation semi-Lagrangian scheme (MPCSL) based on Hermite cubic interpolation. The time discretization is done through a mid-point rule that includes explicit, implicit and a second order Crank-Nicolson approximation. Some examples are considered to demonstrate the usefulness of the schemes. The MPCSL scheme has demonstrated better in reducing the error propagations as compared to the LISL scheme for a linear problem with smooth solution which is obvious because the third-order monotinicity is preserved in the first scheme. The error propagation is comparable in both schemes for the nonsmooth linear problems. Also the MPCSL scheme performs better than the LISL scheme for optimal control problems. Although the CPU times are comparable for both schemes, the order of convergence is better in the MPCSL scheme. Several lemmas and theorems are proved in developing these two schemes.
0 references