Bases of quasi-hereditary covers of diagram algebras. (Q2842336)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Bases of quasi-hereditary covers of diagram algebras. |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6198181
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Bases of quasi-hereditary covers of diagram algebras. |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6198181 |
Statements
13 August 2013
0 references
quasi-hereditary covers
0 references
finite-dimensional algebras
0 references
cellular bases
0 references
Brauer algebras
0 references
walled Brauer algebras
0 references
partition algebras
0 references
Schur algebras
0 references
tableau combinatorics
0 references
permutation modules
0 references
0 references
0.89498776
0 references
0.8817091
0 references
0.8777997
0 references
0.8775339
0 references
0 references
0 references
Bases of quasi-hereditary covers of diagram algebras. (English)
0 references
This paper concerns quasi-hereditary covers of finite-dimensional algebras, in particular of those defined by diagram calculus, such as the Brauer algebra and the partition algebra. The classic example of such a quasi-hereditary cover is the Schur algebra as a cover of the group algebra of the symmetric group, and the idea here is to modify the tableau combinatorics used in that case to construct bases for permutation modules and a cellular basis for the Schur algebra; the author carries this out for the Brauer algebra, the walled Brauer algebra and the partition algebra, developing the appropriate notion of a row-standard tableau in each case and analysing homomorphisms between permutation modules.NEWLINENEWLINE This paper is very well written; in particular, the introduction is very readable and gives a clear overview of the setting. The background information is selected carefully, and the theory for the Schur algebra is recalled in clear detail as a model for the other algebras. There are a few mistakes (``principle'' instead of ``principal'', some confusion between left and right actions, and (as is obligatory in this area) confusion between ``tableau'' and ``tableaux''), but these do not detract from an excellent paper.
0 references