Universal bounds for eigenvalues of a buckling problem. II (Q2844743)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Universal bounds for eigenvalues of a buckling problem. II |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6199353
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Universal bounds for eigenvalues of a buckling problem. II |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6199353 |
Statements
19 August 2013
0 references
estimates for eigenvalues
0 references
biharmonic operator
0 references
buckling problem
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0.98414606
0 references
0.9540814
0 references
0.9335077
0 references
0.9208724
0 references
0.91914046
0 references
0 references
0.9142387
0 references
Universal bounds for eigenvalues of a buckling problem. II (English)
0 references
The aim of the paper is an universal inequality for eigenvalues of the buckling problem NEWLINE\[NEWLINE\begin{cases} \Delta^2 u = - \Lambda \Delta u\text{ in }\Omega, \\ u|_{\partial \Omega} = \dfrac{\partial u}{\partial \nu} = 0, \end{cases}NEWLINE\]NEWLINE where \(\Omega\) is a bounded domain in a Euclidean space \(\mathbb{R}^n\) and \(\nu\) is the outward unit normal vector. The following inequality was proven by \textit{Q.-M. Cheng} and \textit{H. Yang} [Commun. Math. Phys. 262, No. 3, 663--675 (2006; Zbl 1170.35379)]: NEWLINE\[NEWLINE \sum_{i=1}^k(\Lambda_{k+1}-\Lambda_i)^2 \leq \frac{4(n+2)}{n^2} \sum_{i=1}^k(\Lambda_{k+1} - \Lambda_i)\Lambda_i . NEWLINE\]NEWLINE The authors obtain a sharper form of this inequality where \(\frac{4(n+2)}{n^2} \) is replaced by \(\frac{4(n+4/3)}{n^2}\) and conjecture that the inequality holds with \(\frac{4}{n}\), which would be sharp in the sense of the order of \(k\). For the case that \(\Omega\) is a domain in the unit sphere, similar results are given by \textit{Q. Wang} and \textit{C. Xia} [ibid. 270, No. 3, 759--775 (2007; Zbl 1112.74017)]. The paper contains also an improvement on this inequality.
0 references