On the cardinality of countable dense homogeneous spaces (Q2846931)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: On the cardinality of countable dense homogeneous spaces |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6204573
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | On the cardinality of countable dense homogeneous spaces |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6204573 |
Statements
On the cardinality of countable dense homogeneous spaces (English)
0 references
4 September 2013
0 references
countable dense homogeneous
0 references
cardinality
0 references
continuum hypothesis
0 references
A separable topological space \(X\) is \textit{countable dense homogeneous} (CDH) if for every pair \((D,E)\) of countable dense subsets of \(X\) there exists a homeomorphism \(h:X\longrightarrow X\) such that \(h[D]=E\). An interesting (and uncommon) feature of the paper under review is that it deals with arbitrary Hausdorff CDH spaces, without assuming metrizability.NEWLINENEWLINETheorem 2.1 shows that CDH spaces have size at most continuum. Corollary 2.5 shows that, under the assumption \(2^\omega < 2^{\omega_1}\), compact CDH spaces are first-countable. This result is not provable in ZFC, since \textit{J. Steprāns} and \textit{H. X. Zhou} [Topology Appl. 28, No. 2, 147--154 (1988; Zbl 0647.54017)] have shown that \(2^{\omega_1}\) is CDH under \(\mathrm{MA}+\neg\mathrm{CH}\).NEWLINENEWLINEQuestion 1.1 asks whether there exists a ZFC example of a non-metrizable compact CDH space. A natural candidate would be the classical double arrow space \(\mathbb{A}\) of Alexandroff and Urysohn. However, Theorem 3.2 shows that \(\mathbb{A}\) is not CDH. Subsequently, \textit{R. Hernández-Gutiérrez} [Topology Appl. 160, No. 10, 1123--1128 (2013; Zbl 1284.54023)] proved that \(\mathbb{A}\times 2^\omega\) is not CDH either, thus answering Question 3.3.NEWLINENEWLINEFinally, using ideas of \textit{K. Kunen} [Topology Appl. 12, 283--287 (1981; Zbl 0466.54015)], the authors show that Question 1.1 has an affirmative answer under CH (their example is also hereditarily Lindelöf and hereditarily separable). Subsequently, \textit{R. Hernández-Gutiérrez} et al. [Fundam. Math. 226, No. 2, 157--172 (2014; Zbl 1301.54050)] showed that Question 1.1 has an affirmative answer in ZFC.
0 references