On the cardinality of countable dense homogeneous spaces (Q2846931)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6204573
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the cardinality of countable dense homogeneous spaces
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6204573

    Statements

    On the cardinality of countable dense homogeneous spaces (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    4 September 2013
    0 references
    countable dense homogeneous
    0 references
    cardinality
    0 references
    continuum hypothesis
    0 references
    A separable topological space \(X\) is \textit{countable dense homogeneous} (CDH) if for every pair \((D,E)\) of countable dense subsets of \(X\) there exists a homeomorphism \(h:X\longrightarrow X\) such that \(h[D]=E\). An interesting (and uncommon) feature of the paper under review is that it deals with arbitrary Hausdorff CDH spaces, without assuming metrizability.NEWLINENEWLINETheorem 2.1 shows that CDH spaces have size at most continuum. Corollary 2.5 shows that, under the assumption \(2^\omega < 2^{\omega_1}\), compact CDH spaces are first-countable. This result is not provable in ZFC, since \textit{J. Steprāns} and \textit{H. X. Zhou} [Topology Appl. 28, No. 2, 147--154 (1988; Zbl 0647.54017)] have shown that \(2^{\omega_1}\) is CDH under \(\mathrm{MA}+\neg\mathrm{CH}\).NEWLINENEWLINEQuestion 1.1 asks whether there exists a ZFC example of a non-metrizable compact CDH space. A natural candidate would be the classical double arrow space \(\mathbb{A}\) of Alexandroff and Urysohn. However, Theorem 3.2 shows that \(\mathbb{A}\) is not CDH. Subsequently, \textit{R. Hernández-Gutiérrez} [Topology Appl. 160, No. 10, 1123--1128 (2013; Zbl 1284.54023)] proved that \(\mathbb{A}\times 2^\omega\) is not CDH either, thus answering Question 3.3.NEWLINENEWLINEFinally, using ideas of \textit{K. Kunen} [Topology Appl. 12, 283--287 (1981; Zbl 0466.54015)], the authors show that Question 1.1 has an affirmative answer under CH (their example is also hereditarily Lindelöf and hereditarily separable). Subsequently, \textit{R. Hernández-Gutiérrez} et al. [Fundam. Math. 226, No. 2, 157--172 (2014; Zbl 1301.54050)] showed that Question 1.1 has an affirmative answer in ZFC.
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers