On the smoothness of centralizers in reductive groups. (Q2846982)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: On the smoothness of centralizers in reductive groups. |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6204662
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | On the smoothness of centralizers in reductive groups. |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6204662 |
Statements
4 September 2013
0 references
reductive groups
0 references
linear algebraic groups
0 references
smooth centralizers
0 references
subgroup subschemes
0 references
pretty good primes
0 references
0.6749627
0 references
0.66799104
0 references
0.6581753
0 references
0.63675374
0 references
0.63527876
0 references
0 references
0.62454045
0 references
0.62316984
0 references
0.61959887
0 references
On the smoothness of centralizers in reductive groups. (English)
0 references
Let \(G\) be a connected reductive linear algebraic group over an algebraically closed field \(k\), and let \(H\) be a closed subgroup subscheme of \(G\). This paper addresses the question of whether or not the (scheme-theoretic) centralizer of \(H\) is smooth. In the case that \(H\) itself is smooth, the question was addressed by the reviewer and co-authors [\textit{M. Bate} et al., Math. Z. 269, No. 3-4, 809-832 (2011; Zbl 1242.20058)]. The results in this paper are a significant extension of this work.NEWLINENEWLINE The main result of the paper shows that all centralizers of closed subgroup subschemes of \(G\) are smooth if and only if the characteristic of \(k\) is zero or is ``pretty good'' for \(G\). The notion of a pretty good prime, also introduced in this paper, lies in between the existing notions of good and very good for primes and depends only on the root datum of \(G\). It allows one to distinguish between a reductive group and its semisimple part, which is important when answering this question. For example, all primes are pretty good for \(G=\text{GL}_2(k)\), but \(p=2\) is not pretty good for \(G=\text{SL}_2(k)\) (note that the centre of \(\text{SL}_2(k)\) is not smooth in characteristic \(2\)).NEWLINENEWLINE The author also relates his new idea of a pretty good prime to existing notions of standardness for reductive groups, including the ``standard hypotheses'' of \textit{J. C. Jantzen} [Progress in Mathematics 228, 1-211 (2004; Zbl 1169.14319)], giving a unification of all of these ideas.
0 references