Birack dynamical cocycles and homomorphism invariants (Q2847695)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Birack dynamical cocycles and homomorphism invariants |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6207507
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Birack dynamical cocycles and homomorphism invariants |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6207507 |
Statements
11 September 2013
0 references
biracks
0 references
counting invariants
0 references
0 references
0.7820544
0 references
0.74310446
0 references
0.71549046
0 references
0 references
0 references
0.68999237
0 references
0.6790309
0 references
0.6783409
0 references
0.6778222
0 references
Birack dynamical cocycles and homomorphism invariants (English)
0 references
A birack, a set with two binary operations which satisfy some constraints derived from the Reidemeister moves, is widely used in constructing invariants in knot theory. A basic knot invariant is the cardinality of the set of homomorphisms from the fundamental birack of a knot \(K\) to a given finite birack. In [\textit{R. Bauernschmidt} and \textit{S. Nelson}, Commun. Contemp. Math. 15, No. 3, Article ID 1350006, 13 p. (2013; Zbl 1290.57018)], a sort of generalization of the counting invariant was defined. The paper under review offers another enhancement of the counting invariant via an algebraic structure called birack dynamical cocycle.NEWLINENEWLINEMore precisely, for a fixed birack coloring the authors introduce a set \(S\) with maps \(D_{x, y}:S\times S\rightarrow S\times S\), here \(x, y\) are two elements of the birack. Then by assigning elements of \(S\) to the semiarcs of the colored knot diagram one can associate a weight, the number of assignments to the fixed birack coloring. In this way the authors define the birack dynamical cocycle enhanced polynomial, which is an enhancement of the counting invariant. The authors give some examples showing that the new invariant is stronger than the unenhanced counting invariant.
0 references