On a problem of J. Stallings (Q2850640)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: On a problem of J. Stallings |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6212845
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | On a problem of J. Stallings |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6212845 |
Statements
27 September 2013
0 references
maximal space
0 references
maximal connected topology
0 references
submaximal space
0 references
nearly maximal connected space
0 references
extremally disconnected space
0 references
On a problem of J. Stallings (English)
0 references
In 1959, \textit{J. Stallings} [Fundam. Math. 47, 249--263 (1959; Zbl 0114.39102)] asked the following question: Suppose that \(\tau\) is a connected topology on \([0,1]\) finer than the usual Euclidean topology and \(\tau_L\) (respectively, \(\tau_R\)) the topology generated by \(\tau\) together with all half-closed intervals of the form \([a,b)\) (respectively \((a,b])\); if \(L,R\) are subsets of \([0,1]\) such that \(0\in L\), \(1\in R\), \(L\cup R=[0,1]\) and \(L\in\tau_L\), \(R\in\tau_R\), then is it true that \(L\) and \(R\) must intersect? A negative answer was given to this question by \textit{S. K. Hildebrand} [Fundam. Math. 61, 133--140 (1967; Zbl 0185.26101)], but in the paper under review, the authors prove that if the topology \(\tau\) is maximal connected (that is, no strictly finer topology than \(\tau\) is connected), then the question has an affirmative answer.
0 references