Rationality problems and conjectures of Milnor and Bloch-Kato (Q2852241)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Rationality problems and conjectures of Milnor and Bloch-Kato |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6213921
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Rationality problems and conjectures of Milnor and Bloch-Kato |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6213921 |
Statements
8 October 2013
0 references
rationality
0 references
unirationality
0 references
unramified cohomology
0 references
Milnor conjecture
0 references
\(\mathbb A^1\)-connectedness
0 references
Rationality problems and conjectures of Milnor and Bloch-Kato (English)
0 references
The classical Lüroth problem may be formulated as the question whether a unirational variety \(X/k\) is in fact rational. It is known that in general the answer is negative. For \(k={\mathbb C}\) the field of complex numbers \textit{M. Artin} and \textit{D. Mumford} [Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., III. Ser. 25, 75--95 (1972; Zbl 0244.14017)] following a suggestion of C. P. Ramanujam showed that for a smooth complex variety \(X\) the torsion subgroup of the singular cohomology group \(H^{3}(X,{\mathbb Z})\) is a birational invariant. By constructing a conic bundle over a rational surface and exhibiting a \(2\)-torsion class in the above group they found an example of a unirational variety that is not rational.NEWLINENEWLINEIn the paper under review, the author uses unramified cohomology groups to detect counterexamples to the Lüroth problem. The unramified cohomology groups (for any \(i\) and \(j\)) were defined By \textit{J.-L. Colliot-Thélène} and \textit{M. Ojanguren} [Invent. Math. 97, No. 1, 141--158 (1989; Zbl 0686.14050)] as the subgroups \(H^{i}_{ur}(L/k,{{\mu}_{n}^{{\otimes}j}})\) of \(H^{i}_{\text{ét}}(L,{{\mu}_{n}^{{\otimes}j}})\) consisting of the unramified elements at every discrete valuation of \(L\) trivial on \(k.\) Recall that a class \({\alpha}\in H^{i}_{\text{ét}}(L,{{\mu}_{n}^{{\otimes}j}})\) is unramified at a discrete valuation \(\nu\) of \(L/k\) if \(\alpha\) is in the image of the restriction map \(H^{i}_{\text{ét}}(A,{{\mu}_{n}^{{\otimes}j}})\rightarrow H^{i}_{\text{ét}}(L,{{\mu}_{n}^{{\otimes}j}})\) , where \(A\) is the valuation ring associated with \(\nu\). The author generalizes the method of \textit{E. Peyre} [Math. Ann. 296, No. 2, 247--268 (1993; Zbl 0790.12001)] and constructs for any prime \(l\) and \(n\geq 2\) a rationally connected, non-rational variety. The non-rationality of this variety is detected by a non-trivial class of degree \(n\) in its unramified cohomology. By definition for a variety \(X\), \(H^{i}_{ur}(X,{{\mu}_{n}^{{\otimes}j}}):= H^{i}_{ur}(k(X)/k,{{\mu}_{n}^{{\otimes}j}})\). For \(l=2\) these varieties are unirational and their non-rationality cannot be detected by a torsion unramified class of lower degree. The techniques used in the paper follow (to some extent) those used in Voevodsky's proof of the Milnor conjecture and the Voevodsky-Rost proof of the Bloch-Kato conjecture.
0 references