Opening infinitely many nodes (Q2865904)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Opening infinitely many nodes |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6237589
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Opening infinitely many nodes |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6237589 |
Statements
Opening infinitely many nodes (English)
0 references
11 December 2013
0 references
Riemann surface
0 references
Riemann surface with nodes
0 references
prescribed periods
0 references
holomorphic differential
0 references
The author considers holomorphic differentials on the non-compact Riemann surface associated to an infinite connected graph \(\Gamma\). Each vertex in \(\Gamma\) corresponds to a copy of the Riemann sphere in the associated Riemann surface. An edge \(e\) between vertices \(v\) and \(v'\) corresponds to a node at which points \(p_e\) and \(p_e'\) of the spheres corresponding to \(v\) and \(v'\) are identified. The nodes are opened by necks constructed using a sequence \(\mathbf{t} = \big(t_e\big)_{e\in E}\) of complex numbers corresponding to the edges \(e\in E\). Because \(\Gamma\) is infinite, the local coordinates used in the neck construction must satisfy certain technical conditions that would otherwise be unnecessary. Each edge \(e\) corresponds to a neck and thus to a homology class \(\gamma_e\). The motivating question for the paper is whether -- provided a basic necessary condition is satisfied -- a differential can be defined from its periods on the \(\gamma_e\). In case \(\Gamma\) is finite and the Riemann surface is consequently compact, the answer is affirmative for sufficiently small \(\mathbf{t}\) [\textit{J. D. Fay}, Theta functions on Riemann surfaces. Berlin etc.: Springer (1973; Zbl 0281.30013)]. When \(\Gamma\) is infinite, the space of periods is no longer finite dimensional, and the norm used on the space of periods may be expected to be decisive. The main result of the paper specifies a class of admissible norms that yield an affirmative answer to the motivating question. Examples of such admissible norms are provided.
0 references