Domination of operators in the non-commutative setting (Q2866756)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Domination of operators in the non-commutative setting |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6238583
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Domination of operators in the non-commutative setting |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6238583 |
Statements
Domination of operators in the non-commutative setting (English)
0 references
16 December 2013
0 references
ordered Banach spaces
0 references
\(C^{\ast}\)-algebra
0 references
noncommutative function space
0 references
domination problem
0 references
operator ideal
0 references
Suppose that \(E\) and \(F\) are ordered Banach spaces and \(S\) and \(T\) are operators in \(L(E,F)\) such that \(0\leq S\leq T.\) If \(T\) belongs to a certain ideal of operators \(\mathfrak{I}\), does this imply that \(S\) also belongs to \(\mathfrak{I}\)? The paper under review describes several non-commutative instances for which the answer is positive. These refer to the case where \(E\) and/or \(F\) are \(C^{\ast}\)-algebras, preduals of von Neumann algebras or non-commutative function spaces. For example, it is shown that when \(E\) and \(F\) are \(C^{\ast}\)-algebras, then the following two assertions are equivalent: (i) if \(0\leq S\leq T\) and \(T\) is compact, then \(S\) is compact, too; (ii) the spectrum of every self-adjoint element of \(E\) is countable, or every order interval \([0,x]\) of \(F\) is compact.
0 references