A lifting argument for the generalized Grigorieff forcing (Q286703)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: A lifting argument for the generalized Grigorieff forcing |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6585185
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | A lifting argument for the generalized Grigorieff forcing |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6585185 |
Statements
A lifting argument for the generalized Grigorieff forcing (English)
0 references
25 May 2016
0 references
Grigorieff forcing
0 references
lifting argument
0 references
preserving measurability
0 references
0.8741789
0 references
0.86408633
0 references
0.86393243
0 references
0.8625275
0 references
0.86202365
0 references
0.85925865
0 references
0.8561471
0 references
0.8527713
0 references
In this paper, the authors study a generalized version of Grigorieff forcing at inaccessible cardinals and use it to present a new proof of Woodin's celebrated result for forcing the failure of GCH at a measurable cardinal from optimal hypotheses.NEWLINENEWLINEThe forcing, like the case of \textit{S.-D. Friedman} and \textit{K. Thompson} [J. Symb. Log. 73, No. 3, 906--918 (2008; Zbl 1160.03035)], is more uniform than Woodin's original proof (which was based on Cohen forcing), in the sense that the required guiding generic is obtained directly without going to some further extension of the universe; but it is different from that of Friedman-Thompson, as it does not have a treelike structure. Also, unlike Sacks forcing at an inaccessible which is minimal, the resulting generalized Grigorieff forcing is not minimal.NEWLINENEWLINEThe authors think that the method might be useful for obtaining new results concerning cardinal invariants at uncountable regular cardinals (see the open questions at the end of the paper).
0 references