A posteriori error control of discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic obstacle problems (Q2871177)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: A posteriori error control of discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic obstacle problems |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6248920
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | A posteriori error control of discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic obstacle problems |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6248920 |
Statements
A posteriori error control of discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic obstacle problems (English)
0 references
22 January 2014
0 references
discontinuous Galerkin methods
0 references
a posteriori error estimate
0 references
obstacle problem
0 references
variational inequalities
0 references
discrete Lagrange multiplier
0 references
stable multiplier
0 references
Poincaré assumption
0 references
nonlinear smoothing function
0 references
finite element
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
The paper deals with a posteriori error estimates for various discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods for elliptic obstacle problems. A priori error estimates for elliptic variational inequalities of the first and the second kind are considered by \textit{F. Wang} et al. [SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 48, No. 2, 708--733 (2010; Zbl 1214.65039)]. These authors used piecewise linear and quadratic discontinuous finite element spaces. In the present paper, the error estimator is derived by the help of a nonlinear smoothing function. The error estimator is comparable with the known estimator for conforming finite element methods. The error estimator for DG methods involves a discrete Lagrange multiplier. Under the assumption of the Poincaré inequality it is proved that this Lagrange multiplier is stable uniformly on non-uniform meshes. Applications of the results to various DG methods are discussed. Numerical results demonstrating the performance of the error estimator are given. For instance, an example of \textit{S. Bartels} and \textit{C. Carstensen} [Numer. Math. 99, No. 2, 225--249 (2004; Zbl 1063.65050)] is studied. Conclusions and future problems in the topic are mentioned at the end.
0 references