On metric characterizations of the Radon-Nikodým and related properties of Banach spaces (Q2874676)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: On metric characterizations of the Radon-Nikodým and related properties of Banach spaces |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6327954
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | On metric characterizations of the Radon-Nikodým and related properties of Banach spaces |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6327954 |
Statements
8 August 2014
0 references
Banach space
0 references
diamond graph
0 references
geodesic
0 references
infinite tree property
0 references
Laakso space
0 references
martingale
0 references
Radon-Nikodým property
0 references
reflexivity
0 references
0 references
On metric characterizations of the Radon-Nikodým and related properties of Banach spaces (English)
0 references
The author shows (Theorem 1.10) that a dual Banach space \(X\) fails the Radon-Nikodým property (RNP) if and only if there is a bilipschitz map from the infinite diamond space to \(X\). This result is a metric characterization of the RNP for dual spaces. The proof uses Stegall's construction of a bounded \(\delta\)-tree in dual Banach spaces that fail RNP. By induction, a 1-Lipschitz embedding \(f\) of the infinite diamond space \(D_\omega\) to \(X\) is constructed and it is shown that in fact \(f\) is bilipschitz. The paper contains (Theorem 1.12) a (sub)metric characterization of Banach spaces which contain infinite bounded \(\delta\)-trees.NEWLINENEWLINE In Section 4, the author, extending and generalizing previous results of his own, shows that certain metric spaces (with thick families of geodesics between some pair of points) do not admit a bilipschitz embedding into Banach spaces with the RNP (Theorem 4.1, Theorem 4.8). It is shown that the second Laakso space satisfies the conditions of Theorem 4.1.NEWLINENEWLINE Theorems 4.1 and 4.8 are not characterizations of the RNP. It is proved in Theorem 4.9 that, for every metric space \(X\) satisfying the conditions of Theorems 4.1 or 4.8, there is a subspace (a version of \(BR\)) of \(L_1(0,1)\) which fails the RNP and does not admit a bilipschitz embedding of \(X\). (The space \(BR\) constructed by \textit{J. Bourgain} and \textit{H. P. Rosenthal} [Isr. J. Math. 37, 54--75 (1980; Zbl 0445.46015)] fails the RNP and contains no infinite bounded \(\delta\)-trees.)NEWLINENEWLINE In the last section, the author (Theorem 5.1) proves a (sub)metric characterization of reflexivity.
0 references