Extending obstructions to noncommutative functorial spectra (Q2877684)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Extending obstructions to noncommutative functorial spectra |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6334035
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Extending obstructions to noncommutative functorial spectra |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6334035 |
Statements
25 August 2014
0 references
Kochen-Specker theorem
0 references
spectrum
0 references
Gelfand-Naimark theorem
0 references
\(C^{\ast}\)-algebra
0 references
quantale
0 references
locale
0 references
quantum frame
0 references
topos
0 references
math.CT
0 references
math.RA
0 references
Extending obstructions to noncommutative functorial spectra (English)
0 references
The dual equivalence between the category of commutative \(C^{\ast}\)-algebras and that of compact Hausdorff topological spaces was established by \textit{I. Gelfand} and \textit{M. Neumark} [Contemp. Math. 167, 3--20 (1994; Zbl 0824.46060)] more than half a century ago, which was the starting point of Alain Connes' noncommutative geometry and inspired Alexander Grothendieck to construct his famous scheme theory in the middle of the 20th century. Although many noncommutative spectra have been proposed, \textit{M. L. Reyes} [Isr. J. Math. 192, Part B, 667--698 (2012; Zbl 1269.18001)] has observed that none of them behaves functorially, establishing that they could not without taking pain of trivialization on the prototypical noncommutative rings \(M_{n}(\mathbb C)\). His elaborate proof is based upon \textit{S. Kochen} and \textit{E. P. Specker}'s famous no-go theorem [J. Math. Mech. 17, 59--87 (1967; Zbl 0156.23302)]. The main result of this article is that this daunting obstruction cannot be circumvented simply by allowing locales, toposes, ringed spaces or even quantales as pointless extensions of the classical notion of space. The result is technically based upon the authors' works [Appl. Categ. Struct. 20, No. 4, 393--414 (2012; Zbl 1261.46051); ibid. 21, No. 1, 103--104 (2013; Zbl 1328.46043)].NEWLINENEWLINEThe second author and \textit{M. L. Reyes} [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 416, No. 1, 289--313 (2014; Zbl 1310.46053)] have proposed a completely new notion of spectrum for arbitrary \(AW^{\ast}\)-algebras. Classically, \textit{C. A. Akemann} [J. Funct. Anal. 4, 277--294 (1969; Zbl 0177.17603); Pac. J. Math. 39, 1--11 (1971; Zbl 0203.44502)] and \textit{R. Giles} and \textit{H. Kummer} [Indiana Univ. Math. J. 21, 91--102 (1971; Zbl 0205.26801)] have proposed a noncommutative notion of spectrum, but the desired correspondence is merely functorial partially. The so-called Bohrification, giving rise to a functor from the category of \(C^{\ast}\)-algebras to that of localic topoi, loses some essential information, enabling one only to reconstruct the partial \(C^{\ast}\)-algebra structure of the original \(C^{\ast}\)-algebra. \textit{J. Rosický} [Cah. Topologie Géom. Différ. Catég. 30, No. 2, 95--110 (1989; Zbl 0676.46047)] constructed a functor from the category of \(C^{\ast}\)-algebras to that of quantum frames, taking into account only the Jordanian structure of the original \(C^{\ast}\)-algebra. There is no nondegenerate functor between the category of quantum frames and that of quantales.
0 references