Algebraic and topological reflexivity of spaces of Lipschitz functions (Q2891110)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6045939
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Algebraic and topological reflexivity of spaces of Lipschitz functions
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6045939

    Statements

    0 references
    0 references
    13 June 2012
    0 references
    Lipschitz function spaces
    0 references
    algebraic reflexivity
    0 references
    topological reflexivity
    0 references
    isometry group
    0 references
    Algebraic and topological reflexivity of spaces of Lipschitz functions (English)
    0 references
    The paper under review investigates algebraic and topological properties of classes of isometries between Lipschitz function spaces (especially algebraic reflexivity and topological reflexivity of subsets of the surjective isometries between \(\text{Lip}(X)\) and \(\text{Lip}(Y)\)).NEWLINENEWLINE The authors are interested in a result on linear isometries between Banach spaces of scalar valued Lipschitz functions due to \textit{A. Jiménez-Vargas} and \textit{M. Villegas-Vallecillos} [Houston J. Math. 34, No. 4, 1165--1184 (2008; Zbl 1169.46004)], stated as Theorem 1.1 in the paper.NEWLINENEWLINE They begin by giving some examples showing that the conditions in Theorem 1.1 are not sufficient for a weighted composition operator to be an isometry. This motivates the sequel of the paper.NEWLINENEWLINE Let us mention Theorem 2.1. Let \(X\) and \(Y\) be compact metric spaces.NEWLINENEWLINE \((1)\) If there exists an injective real valued function \(f\in \text{Lip}(X)\), then \(\mathcal G_\ast(\text{Lip}(X),\text{Lip}(Y))\) is algebraically reflexive.NEWLINENEWLINE \((2)\) If \(Y\) is an \(n\)-dimensional compact and connected manifold without boundary, then \(\mathcal G_\ast(\text{Lip}(X),\text{Lip}(Y))\) is algebraically reflexive.NEWLINENEWLINE Here, \(\mathcal G(\text{Lip}(X),\text{Lip}(Y))\) is the set of all surjective linear isometries between \(\text{Lip}(X)\) and \(\text{Lip}(Y)\); and \(\mathcal G_\ast(\text{Lip}(X),\text{Lip}(Y))=\{T\in\mathcal G(\text{Lip}(X),\text{Lip}(Y)) : T(1_X)\) is a nonvanishing contraction\(\}\).NEWLINENEWLINE On the other hand, we also mention Proposition 3.1, asserting that, under some specific compactness hypothesis on \(X\) and \(Y\), an operator \(T\in\mathcal L(\text{Lip}(X),\text{Lip}(Y))\) is surjective provided that \(T\) is a topologically surjective isometry.NEWLINENEWLINE As a corollary (see Corollary 3.1), under the same assumptions on \(X\) and \(Y\), the space \(\mathcal G_1(\text{Lip}(X),\text{Lip}(Y))\) of \(T\in\mathcal G_\ast(\text{Lip}(X),\text{Lip}(Y))\) preserving unities, is topologically reflexive.
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references