Approximation order of nonstationary tight wavelet frames in Sobolev spaces (Q2897021)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Approximation order of nonstationary tight wavelet frames in Sobolev spaces |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6053432
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Approximation order of nonstationary tight wavelet frames in Sobolev spaces |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6053432 |
Statements
5 July 2012
0 references
nonstationary wavelets
0 references
tight frames
0 references
Sobolev spaces
0 references
approximation order
0 references
Approximation order of nonstationary tight wavelet frames in Sobolev spaces (English)
0 references
The author investigates the approximation order of nonstationary tight wavelet frames in Sobolev spaces. The obtained results are similar to Theorem 1.1 in [\textit{B. Han} and \textit{Z. Shen}, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 40, No. 3, 905--938 (2008; Zbl 1161.42312)], where the approximation error is measured in the \(L^2(\mathbb{R})\)-norm.NEWLINENEWLINEThe main result (Theorem 3.1) states that, under certain assumptions on the masks \(\hat{a}_j\) and \(\hat{b}_j^\ell\), \(j \in \mathbb{N}\), \(\ell \in \{1,\dots,L\}\), the frame operator truncated at level \(n\), \(Q_n(f)\), satisfies: NEWLINE\[NEWLINE \| f- Q_n (f) \|_{H^s(\mathbb{R})} \leq C 2^{(s+1/2)n}n^{\nu \alpha} 2^{-\nu(1-\beta)n} |f|_{H^\nu(\mathbb{R})}, \quad n \geq N, \forall f \in H^\nu(\mathbb{R}),NEWLINE\]NEWLINE where \(C>0\) is independent of \(f\) and \(n\). The precise values of the constants \(\nu, s, \alpha,\beta,N\) in the above estimate depend on the masks \(\hat{a}_j\), \(j \in \mathbb{N}\), but must be in the range: NEWLINE\[NEWLINE s \geq 0, \, \nu \leq s +\frac{1}{2}, \, \nu \in \frac{1}{2}\mathbb{N}, \, N \in \mathbb{N}, \, \alpha\geq 0, \, 0 \leq \beta \leq 1-\frac{s+1/2}{\nu}. NEWLINE\]NEWLINE The term \(2^{(s+1/2)n}\) in the above estimate is new compared to the estimate in Theorem 1.1 in [loc. cit.] in which the error \(f- Q_n (f)\) is measured in the \(L^2(\mathbb{R})\)-norm. Hence, there is a gap of one-half in the exponent, i.e., \(2^{n\frac{1}{2}}\) between the two estimates.NEWLINENEWLINENote that (1) and the first part of (3) in the main theorem (Theorem 3.1) are stated as conclusions, but they are, in fact, assumptions.
0 references