The linearity of the ropelengths of Conway algebraic knots in terms of their crossing numbers (Q2900334)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: The linearity of the ropelengths of Conway algebraic knots in terms of their crossing numbers |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6059352
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | The linearity of the ropelengths of Conway algebraic knots in terms of their crossing numbers |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6059352 |
Statements
22 July 2012
0 references
ropelength
0 references
crossing number
0 references
Conway algebraic knot
0 references
0.82726026
0 references
0 references
0.7517506
0 references
0.74768436
0 references
0.71371675
0 references
0.7113944
0 references
0.71057206
0 references
0.70930433
0 references
0.70552623
0 references
0.7042479
0 references
The linearity of the ropelengths of Conway algebraic knots in terms of their crossing numbers (English)
0 references
Given a smooth knot or link \(K\) in \(\mathbb R^3\), the thickness of \(K\) is the maximal radius of the normal tubular neighborhoods of \(K\). A knot type \(\mathcal K\) is a collection of knots or links that are equivalent in \(\mathbb R^3\). Then the ropelength of \(\mathcal K\), denoted by \(L(\mathcal K)\), is defined to be the infimum of the length of \(K\) taken over all \(K\) in \(\mathcal K\) with unit thickness. The existence of \(L(\mathcal K)\) for each \(\mathcal K\) has been shown in [\textit{J. Cantarella, R. B. Kusner} and \textit{J. M. Sullivan}, Invent. Math. 150, No. 2, 257--286 (2002; Zbl 1036.57001)]. In the present paper, the authors study the relationship between \(L(\mathcal K)\) and the minimal crossing number \(Cr(\mathcal K)\) of \(\mathcal K\) for Conway algebraic knots. They show that there exists a constant \(a > 0\) such that if a knot of \(\mathcal K\) admits a Conway algebraic knot diagram with \(n\) crossings, then \(L(\mathcal K) \leq a\cdot n\), and further if the diagram is alternating (but not necessarily reduced), then \(L(\mathcal K) \leq a\cdot Cr(\mathcal K)\).
0 references