On iterative solution for linear complementarity problem with an \(H_{+}\)-matrix (Q2903112)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: On iterative solution for linear complementarity problem with an \(H_{+}\)-matrix |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6070719
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | On iterative solution for linear complementarity problem with an \(H_{+}\)-matrix |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6070719 |
Statements
23 August 2012
0 references
\(P\)-matrices
0 references
real positive definite matrices
0 references
\(M\)-matrices
0 references
\(H_{+}\)-matrices
0 references
strictly diagonally dominant matrices
0 references
iterative schemes
0 references
scaled extrapolation
0 references
(block) modulus algorithm
0 references
modulus-based matrix splitting iteration methods
0 references
modified AOR method
0 references
linear complementarity problem
0 references
numerical examples
0 references
accelerated overrelaxation
0 references
On iterative solution for linear complementarity problem with an \(H_{+}\)-matrix (English)
0 references
For the solution of the linear complementarity problem (LCP), which usually encounters in linear and convex quadratic programming, free boundary value problems of fluid mechanics etc., many iterative methods have been proposed, especially, when the matrix of the problem is a real positive definite or an \(H_{+}\)-matrix. It is assumed that the real matrix of the LCP is an \(H_{+}\)-matrix and that it is solved by using a new method, the scaled extrapolated block modulus algorithm, as well as an improved version of the very recently introduced modulus-based matrix splitting modified accelerated overrelaxation iteration method. Numerical examples are given to show that the two new methods are very effective and competitive with each other.
0 references