Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
On Leopoldt's conjecture and a special case of Greenberg's conjecture - MaRDI portal

On Leopoldt's conjecture and a special case of Greenberg's conjecture (Q2906522)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6077562
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On Leopoldt's conjecture and a special case of Greenberg's conjecture
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6077562

    Statements

    5 September 2012
    0 references
    Leopoldt's conjecture
    0 references
    Greenberg's conjecture
    0 references
    Iwasawa theory
    0 references
    On Leopoldt's conjecture and a special case of Greenberg's conjecture (English)
    0 references
    This paper should be treated as a report (in a special case) of the author's attempt to prove Leopoldt's conjecture.NEWLINENEWLINELet \(K\) be a number field and let \(r_2\) denote the number of pairs of complex embeddings. Fix a prime \(p\). Then the number of independent \(\mathbb Z_p\)-extensions of \(K\) is \(1+r_2+\delta\) for some \(\delta \geq 0\). The integer \(\delta\) is called the Leopoldt defect and Leopoldt's conjecture asserts that \(\delta = 0\) (of course, there are many equivalent formulations). Leopoldt's conjecture is known if \(K\) is an abelian extension of \(\mathbb Q\) or of an imaginary quadratic number field as shown by \textit{A. Brumer} [Mathematika 14, 121--124 (1967; Zbl 0171.01105)]. There are very few further results.NEWLINENEWLINEIn the paper under review the author claims to show that if \(K\) is totally real and the prime \(p\) is totally split, then Leopoldt's conjecture holds. The strategy is to show that Leopoldt's conjecture (in this case) is equivalent to a conjecture of \textit{R. Greenberg} [Am. J. Math. 98, 263--284 (1976; Zbl 0334.12013)] and then to prove this conjecture.NEWLINENEWLINEHowever, the proofs are only sketched and the reviewer has not been able to verify all the details.NEWLINENEWLINEFor the entire collection see [Zbl 1235.00048].
    0 references

    Identifiers