Period 3 and chaos for unimodal maps (Q379853)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Period 3 and chaos for unimodal maps |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6224714
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Period 3 and chaos for unimodal maps |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6224714 |
Statements
Period 3 and chaos for unimodal maps (English)
0 references
11 November 2013
0 references
period 3
0 references
unimodal map
0 references
Schwarzian derivative
0 references
chaos
0 references
stability
0 references
hyperbolic
0 references
subshift of finite type
0 references
0.80048615
0 references
0.76166034
0 references
0.7581919
0 references
0.74149203
0 references
0.7395615
0 references
0.7393622
0 references
For the logistic map \(f(x)=\mu x (1-x)\) with \(\mu=3.839\), \textit{R. L. Devaney} [An introduction to chaotic dynamical systems. 2nd ed. Redwood City, CA etc.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. (1989; Zbl 0695.58002)] showed that all points in \((0,1)\) are either in the basin of attraction of a stable period-3 orbit or iterate to an invariant Cantor set which is topologically conjugate to a subshift of finite type. The paper reviewed here shows that similar behavior occurs for a more general class of unimodal maps through a careful analysis of the ordering of fixed points and critical points and study of the basins of attraction.NEWLINENEWLINETo be more specific, the considered unimodal maps have negative Schwarzian derivative, derivative more than 1 at 0, a stable period-3 orbit, and an unstable period-3 orbit. For maps in this class, the authors show that all points in \((0,1)\) are either in the basin of attraction of the stable period-3 orbit or iterate to a compact invariant set \(\Lambda\) which is semiconjugate to a subshift of finite type. Under some additional conditions, the semiconjugacy is shown to be a conjugacy by proving that \(\Lambda\) is hyperbolic.
0 references