Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
The one-shot method for a pressure correction Navier-Stokes solver: an example where optimisation can be faster than simulation - MaRDI portal

The one-shot method for a pressure correction Navier-Stokes solver: an example where optimisation can be faster than simulation (Q391688)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6244403
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The one-shot method for a pressure correction Navier-Stokes solver: an example where optimisation can be faster than simulation
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6244403

    Statements

    The one-shot method for a pressure correction Navier-Stokes solver: an example where optimisation can be faster than simulation (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    10 January 2014
    0 references
    Summary: We show an exemplary optimisation problem for a fluid flow where a numerical optimisation run can be as fast as and even faster than a pure simulation. In this example, the optimisation parameter is the upper boundary value in a two-dimensional driven cavity flow, mathematically described by the stationary incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. The stationary solution of the equations is computed by pseudo-time stepping, i.e., by running a transient solver into a steady state, using additional inner pressure correction steps. We compare optimisation methods of Newton and quasi-Newton type that use the fully converged state and derivative with an alternating algorithm that performs a parameter update already after a few steps of the state and derivative iterations. All derivatives are computed via automatic differentiation. The alternating algorithm is able to produce the mentioned fast optimisation results. A second example configuration shows that this phenomenon is problem-dependent and cannot be generalised.
    0 references
    automatic differentiation
    0 references
    one-shot optimisation
    0 references
    fixed point solver
    0 references
    pressure-correction solver
    0 references
    Navier-Stokes equations
    0 references

    Identifiers